ARSBN
The Romanian Association for Baltic and Nordic Studies

 

site search by freefind advanced
 

Welcome to the Romanian Association for Baltic and Nordic Studies

Main Menu

Bun venit la ARSBN!

About
Call for papers
Statement of ethics
Submission guidelines
Peer-review process
Subscription
Abstracting and indexing
Volume 1, Issue 1 (2009)
Volume 2, Issue 1 (2010)
Volume 2, Issue 2 (2010)
Volume 3, Issue 1 (2011)
Volume 3, Issue 2 (2011)
Volume 4, Issue 1 (2012)
Volume 4, Issue 2 (2012)
Volume 5, Issue 1 (2013)
Volume 5, Issue 2 (2013)
Volume 6, Issue 1 (2014)
Volume 6, Issue 2 (2014)
Volume 7, Issue 1 (2015)
Volume 7, Issue 2 (2015)
Volume 8, Issue 1 (2016)
Authors

 

TO BE OR TO BECOME ‘EUROPEAN’? ‘WESTERNIZING’ NARRATIVES IN POST-COLD WAR FINLAND

 

 

Elena Dragomir

 

University of Helsinki, E-mail: elenadragomir78@yahoo.com

 

 

Abstract:

The Finnish ‘westernizing’ narrative emphasizes Finland’s ‘westernness’, i.e. the idea that Finland and Finns have always been western and part of the ‘European family’. The recent past is not seen as an obstacle for this interpretation. Thus, according to this type of discourse, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and ‘liberated’ from the constraints of the Cold War, Finland could finally ‘return’ to the West, to Europe, to its ‘natural’ origins. This article examines in short what might be called the post-Cold War narrative of Finnish westernness as it appears in the English language sources. It argues that the westernizing narrative is very important in justifying Finland’s post-Cold War position in the international politics, especially its position in the European politics.  The article is divided in two parts. The first one examines the narrative of the westernness of Finland, Finns or Finnish ‘identity’ as it appears in some scientific writings, press materials and political texts. Within this narrative an important element is the re-evaluation of Finland’s international position during the Cold War. Therefore, the Finnish security ‘solution’ – by some called ‘Nordic and neutral identity’[1] – is either criticized, attacked and characterized as an aberration and betrayal of the ‘Finnish western identity’, or accepted as the only possible ‘instrument for pursuing national security interests’ in those times. The second part of the article advances some explanations for this narrative and addresses questions such as: why was it developed, by whom, and how successful was it? The article shows how highly political is the (re)presentation of Finnish history and how much its ‘western character’ is related to Finland’s current political situation and goals in Europe. It also reveals how important the ideology is in backing a political choice.

 

Rezumat:

Discursul întoarcerii catre Occident în Finlanda, subliniaza ideea ca Finlanda si finlandezii au fost dintotdeauna occidentali si parte a “familiei europene”. Conform acestei interpretari, dupa colapsul Uniunii Sovietice si “eliberata” de constrângerile impuse de realitatile Razboiului Rece, Finlanda a putut în sfârsit sa se întoarca spre vest, catre Europa, catre originile sale “naturale”. Acest articol trateaza pe scurt ceea ce s-ar putea numi discursul post-Razboi Rece al întoarcerii Finlandei catre Occident, asa cum apare el în sursele de limba engleza. Se sustine ideea ca acest discurs este un element foarte important în justificarea politicii internationale pe care a dus-o Finlanda mai ales pe plan european dupa sfârsitul Razboiului Rece. Articolul este structurat în doua parti. Cea dintâi prezinta acest discurs asa cum apare el în texte stiintifice, declaratii politice sau materiale de presa, aratând cum este (re)prezentata istoria Finlandei în acest proces. Iar cea de-a doua propune o serie de explicatii privind cauzele dezvoltarii acestui tip de discurs. Articolul arata cât de puternic sunt influentate de factorul politic scrierea si interpretarea istoriei finlandeze.

 

Keywords: Finland, European Union, westernizing narratives, finlandization debate



[1] Sami Moisio and Vilho Harle argue that the Finnish neutrality policy ‘represents not identity or identity politics per se but rather a realistic foreign policy’. Sami Moisio and Vilho Harle, ‘The Limits of Geopolitical Remote Sensing’ Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47, No. 2 (2006): 208


05.Dragomir.pdf

News / Actualitati